Association Health Plans allowed small businesses to band together for more affordable healthcare, and they have been a hot topic of late. After the Department of Labor under the Trump administration issued its final ruling on Association Health Plans (AHPs) last summer, several states took up issue with it. Specifically, eleven states and the District of Columbia sued the DOL, arguing that the broad availability of AHPs as outlined in the final rule goes against the consumer protections provided by the Affordable Care Act, and that the new regulation reflects a misinterpretation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1984 (ERISA).
Last night, March 28th, Federal Judge John Bates sided with these states and ruled to blocked components of the new AHP rule. Specifically, he stated that the provision allowing small business and the self-employed to buy health insurance on the large-group market was a clear “end run” around the ACA, and, therefore, illegal.
AHPs are not being subject to the same requirements of the ACA, such as the provision of essential healthcare and the ability to base premiums on individual demographic factors. This led some to believe that the quality of healthcare provided by an AHP will not be adequate. Further, the final rule’s expansion of the term “employer” goes against ERISA’s intent to protect large companies’ plans. By enabling small businesses and individuals to join together and benefit from large group insurance rates, Judge Bates argued, AHPs violate components of the ACA that clearly define rules according to entity size.
What does this mean for AHPs now? Firstly, the new AHP rules in the eleven states who filed a suit and D.C. is no longer valid. Other states may choose to be more generous, as insurance is still regulated at the state level. Otherwise, the old AHP regulations, the ones in existing prior to June of 2018, still apply.
Ultimately, the court’s ruling yesterday stems from a misalignment between the Final Rule, ERISA and the ACA. Please get in touch if you have any questions.
Latest posts by Karin Landry (see all)
- 5 Reasons to Consider an Integrated Workers’ Comp and Disability Program - May 7, 2019
- Legal Alert: New Court Ruling on Association Health Plans - March 29, 2019
- Your 6-Step Plan to Captive Optimization - August 13, 2018
- Local Shakeup: What a Partners & Harvard Pilgrim Merger Could Mean For You - May 14, 2018
- What 831(b) Captive Owners Need to Know About IRS Notice 2016-66 - November 7, 2016