Once a bit of an afterthought, voluntary benefits are now quite mainstream and used as a tool for employers to provide top-notch, competitive benefits to employees while not increasing their costs. At a time when organizations are struggling to battle the rising costs of healthcare while retaining and recruiting top talent, many have recognized the value of a voluntary program in recent years. With such increased popularity, it’s important for employers to understand all the legal ramifications of their offerings.
The Employee Retirement Income Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that outlines standards for certain pension and health plans. ERISA effectively guides what an employer is allowed and prohibited from doing when it comes to establishing, maintaining and publicizing these benefits. When it comes to voluntary plans, its relationship with ERISA is a bit murky:
- which plans does ERISA apply to?
- what is the safe harbor policy?
- what are the consequences of violating ERISA for voluntary?
In this recorded webinar, I explain the answers to these questions and more. Failing compliance when it comes to voluntary and ERISA is likely a misunderstanding that your organization cannot afford, and it’s important to know the legal nuances that exist when talking about ERISA and voluntary benefits vs. other types. With many employers turning to voluntary programs to solve some of their benefits challenges, it’s critical that they are executed within the realms of the law.
Fill out the form below to learn all about this complex topic. I’ll outline key points and info and you’ll be able to listen to real questions asked by your peers.
Latest posts by Christine Culgin (see all)
- 9 Areas of Focus for HR Right Now – Part 7 - January 8, 2021
- 9 Areas of Focus for HR Right Now: Parts 5 and 6 - December 15, 2020
- 9 Areas of Focus For Employers Right Now: Parts 3 and 4 - November 12, 2020
- Spring Hits it Big in Captive International’s US Awards - October 6, 2020
- DOL Issues Updated FFCRA Regulations In Light Of Recent Federal Court Decision - September 18, 2020